Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_storage_account - Extend the support level of (blob|queue|share)_properties for Storage kind #25427

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

magodo
Copy link
Collaborator

@magodo magodo commented Mar 27, 2024

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

Update document of azurerm_storage_account for the viable combinations for (queue|share)_properties

azurerm_storage_account - Extend the support level of (blob|queue|share)_properties for Storage kind

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)
terraform-provider-azurerm on  storage_tier_kind_doc via 🐹 v1.22.1
💤  TF_ACC=1 go test -v -timeout=20h ./internal/services/storage -run='TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_'
=== RUN   TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_blobProperties
=== PAUSE TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_blobProperties
=== RUN   TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_queueProperties
=== PAUSE TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_queueProperties
=== RUN   TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_shareProperties
=== PAUSE TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_shareProperties
=== CONT  TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_blobProperties
=== CONT  TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_shareProperties
=== CONT  TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_queueProperties
--- PASS: TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_blobProperties (143.56s)
--- PASS: TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_queueProperties (158.50s)
--- PASS: TestAccStorageAccount_StorageV1_shareProperties (159.78s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/internal/services/storage       159.808s

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_storage_account - Extend the support level of (blob|queue|share)_properties for Storage kind [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #25422

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Copy link
Member

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we rephrase these to be clearer?

website/docs/r/storage_account.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/storage_account.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@rcskosir
Copy link
Contributor

@magodo 👋 Thank you for using our new PR template! Can you please update the template to include the description for this PR under the description heading? This helps with the review process as well as traceability in the future for our users.

Co-authored-by: Tom Harvey <tombuildsstuff@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Harvey <tombuildsstuff@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Member

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise LGTM 👍

website/docs/r/storage_account.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MedFazazi
Copy link

Hi there, have you had a chance to check out my comment on this issue?

#25422 (comment)

@magodo magodo changed the title Doc: Update document of azurerm_storage_account for the viable combinations for (queue|share)_properties azurerm_storage_account - Extend the support level of (blob|queue|share)_properties for Storage kind Mar 29, 2024
@magodo magodo added the bug label Mar 29, 2024
@magodo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

magodo commented Mar 29, 2024

@tombuildsstuff As @MedFazazi has mentioned, our existing feature check didn't account for the kind Storage, I've modified my PR to extend the support level of (blob|queue|share)_properties for Storage kind then. Please take another look!

@MedFazazi
Copy link

MedFazazi commented Mar 31, 2024

Hello @magodo,
Thank you for your efforts in extending the support level for blob_properties, queue_properties, and share_properties to the Storage kind. I wanted to kindly inquire if there's a possibility to also include support for configuring table_properties, including logging features, in Azure Storage Accounts. The ability to manage table service properties, including logging, through Terraform would greatly enhance its usability for various use cases.

Additionally, I would like to draw attention to issue #3581, which seems to be in the same context

Thank you for considering this request!

Warm regards,

Copy link
Member

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a couple of comments around the docs but otherwise 👍

website/docs/r/storage_account.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/storage_account.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
katbyte and others added 2 commits April 8, 2024 13:45
Co-authored-by: Tom Harvey <tombuildsstuff@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tom Harvey <tombuildsstuff@users.noreply.github.com>
@katbyte katbyte merged commit 0777434 into hashicorp:main Apr 8, 2024
6 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.99.0 milestone Apr 8, 2024
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
dduportal pushed a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>changes detected:&#xA;&#x9;&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from
&#34;3.98.0&#34; to &#34;3.99.0&#34; in file
&#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.99.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.99.0&#xA;BREAKING
CHANGE: &#xA;&#xA;* `azurerm_linux_web_app` -
`site_config.0.application_stack.0.java_version` must be specified with
`java_server` and `java_server_version`
([#25553](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25553))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.20240411.1104331` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk/resourcemanager` and
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk/sdk`
([#25546](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25546))&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.26.1` of
`github.com/tombuildsstuff/giovanni`
([#25551](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25551))&#xA;*
`azurerm_key_vault` - deprecate the `contact` property from v3.x
provider and update properties to Computed &amp; Optional
([#25552](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25552))&#xA;*
`azurerm_key_vault_certificate_contacts` - in v4.0 make the `contact`
property optional to allow for deletion of contacts from the key vault
([#25552](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25552))&#xA;*
`azurerm_signalr_service` - support for setting the `sku` property to
`Premium_P2`
([#25578](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25578))&#xA;*
`azurerm_snapshot` - support for the `network_access_policy` and
`public_network_access_enabled` properties
([#25421](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25421))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_account` - extend the support level of
`(blob|queue|share)_properties` for Storage kind
([#25427](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25427))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_blob` - support for the `encryption_scope` property
([#25551](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25551))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_container` - support for the `default_encryption_scope`
and `encryption_scope_override_enabled` properties
([#25551](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25551))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_data_lake_gen2_filesystem` - support for the
`default_encryption_scope` property
([#25551](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25551))&#xA;*
`azurerm_subnet` - the `delegation.x.service_delegation.x.name` property
now supports `Oracle.Database/networkAttachments`
([#25571](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25571))&#xA;*
`azurerm_web_pubsub` - support setting the `sku` property to
`Premium_P2`
([#25578](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25578))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* provider: fix an issue where the provider was not
correctly configured when using a custom metadata host
([#25546](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25546))&#xA;*
storage: fix a number of potential crashes during plan/apply with
resources using the Storage data plane API
([#25525](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25525))&#xA;*
`azurerm_application_insights` - fix issue where the wrong Application
ID was set into the property `app_id`
([#25520](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25520))&#xA;*
`azurerm_application_insights_api_key` - add a state migration to
re-case static segments of the resource ID
([#25567](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25567))&#xA;*
`azurerm_container_app_environment_certificate` - the `subject_name`
attribute is now correctly populated
([#25516](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25516))&#xA;*
`azurerm_function_app_slot` - will now taint the resource when partially
created
([#24520](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24520))&#xA;*
`azurerm_linux_function_app` - will now taint the resource when
partially created
([#24520](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24520))&#xA;*
`azurerm_managed_disk` - filtering the Resource SKUs response to reduce
the memory overhead, when determining whether a Managed Disk can be
online resized or not
([#25549](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25549))&#xA;*
`azurerm_monitor_alert_prometheus_rule_group` - the `severity` property
is now set correctly when `0`
([#25408](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25408))&#xA;*
`azurerm_monitor_smart_detector_alert_rule` - normalising the value for
`id` within the `action_group` block
([#25559](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25559))&#xA;*
`azurerm_redis_cache_access_policy_assignment` - the `object_id_alias`
property now allows usernames
([#25523](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25523))&#xA;*
`azurerm_windows_function_app` - will not taint the resource when
partially created
([#24520](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24520))&#xA;*
`azurerm_windows_function_app` - will not taint the resource when
partially created
([#24520](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24520))&#xA;&#xA;DEPRECATIONS:&#xA;&#xA;*
`azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - the `connection_strings` property has been
superseded by the primary and secondary connection strings for sql,
mongodb and readonly
([#25510](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25510))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - the `enable_free_tier` property has been
superseded by `free_tier_enabled`
([#25510](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25510))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - the `enable_multiple_write_locations`
property has been superseded by `multiple_write_locations_enabled`
([#25510](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25510))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - the `enable_automatic_failover` property
has been superseded by `automatic_failover_enabled`
([#25510](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25510))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/updatecli/job/azure/job/main/105/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 9, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

queue_properties aren't supported for account kind "Storage" in sku tier "Standard"
5 participants