Support for [additional dedicated host SKUs - DSv3-Type2 and ESv3-Type2]

[ssrirama-aka]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
• If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Description

The newly introduced azurerm_dedicated_host validates the sku_name property for one of DSv3-Type1, ESv3-Type1, FSv2-Type2 valid values. Microsoft Azure recently introduced two additional SKUs DSv3-Type2 and ESv3-Type2 for their Dedicated Host offering. Request that validation for azurerm_dedicated_host implementation be changed to allow these two Type 2 SKUs.

New or Affected Resource(s)

Affects existing azurerm_dedicated_host resource, sku_name property.

Potential Terraform Configuration

No changes to existing Terraform configuration. Existing property should support additional valid values.

# Copy-paste your Terraform configurations here - for large Terraform configs,
# please use a service like Dropbox and share a link to the ZIP file. For
# security, you can also encrypt the files using our GPG public key.

References

Based on the 1.42 delivered feature, tracked in this pull request

• #0000

[ghost]

This has been released in version 2.0.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.0.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!