Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_function_app - Add WEBSITE_CONTENT & WEBSITE_CONTENTAZUREFILECONNECTIONSTRING for premium plans #5761

Conversation

francescopersico
Copy link
Contributor

@francescopersico francescopersico commented Feb 14, 2020

The actual code only works for consumption plan but WEBSITE_CONTENT settings are required also on premium plans.

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @francescopersico,

I'm not sure for the reasoning behind this change (and not entire familiar with function apps tbh). could you describe the problem a little more and perhaps write a test that fails without this change, and then passes with it? thanks!

@francescopersico
Copy link
Contributor Author

francescopersico commented Feb 29, 2020

@katbyte

The WEBSITE_CONTENTSHARE and WEBSITE_CONTENTAZUREFILECONNECTIONSTRING app_settings are required for consumption and premium plans as stated here https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-app-settings#website_contentazurefileconnectionstring.

The code in master branch automatically add these settings but only for consumption plan [="dynamic"] (the reason is that the premium plan is quite new). What i have done is change the "if" to also include the settings on premium plans [="elasticpremium"].

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for clarifying @francescopersico,

This PR looks good to me but it does seem like we have another PR #5420 which is removing these settings entirely and i am inclined to thinking yours is correct 🤔 WDYT?

@katbyte katbyte changed the title Add WEBSITE_CONTENT on premium plans azurerm_function_app - Add WEBSITE_CONTENT for premium plans Mar 18, 2020
@katbyte katbyte added this to the v2.2.0 milestone Mar 18, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As the conflicting PR has been closed this LGTM now @francescopersico 🙂

@katbyte katbyte changed the title azurerm_function_app - Add WEBSITE_CONTENT for premium plans azurerm_function_app - Add WEBSITE_CONTENT & WEBSITE_CONTENTAZUREFILECONNECTIONSTRING for premium plans Mar 18, 2020
@katbyte katbyte merged commit cdeb487 into hashicorp:master Mar 18, 2020
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 19, 2020

This has been released in version 2.2.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.2.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost ghost removed the waiting-response label Mar 19, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 17, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@hashicorp hashicorp locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 17, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants