New Resource: azurerm_spatial_anchors_account
#6011
Conversation
mbfrahry
commented
Mar 6, 2020
mbfrahry
commented
ghost
added
| `, data.RandomInteger, data.Locations.Primary, data.RandomInteger) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func testAccAzureRMSpatialAnchorsAccount_tags(data acceptance.TestData) string { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe we should just use complete for consistency/if new optional properties are added?
| } | ||
|
|
||
| resource "azurerm_resource_group" "test" { | ||
| name = "acctestRG-%d" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could we make the rg name reflect the service
| name = "acctestRG-%d" | |
| name = "acctestRG-mr-%d" |
| resource_group_name = azurerm_resource_group.test.name | ||
|
|
||
| tags = { | ||
| environment = "production" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should make sure casing is preserved
| environment = "production" | |
| Environment = "Production" |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| resource "azurerm_spatial_anchors_account" "test" { | ||
| name = "acctestdf%d" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
and make sure upper case is preserved here too
|
This has been released in version 2.1.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 2.1.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
