Support updating customData on Azure RM VM Scaling Sets #61
Comments
|
I have confirmed via ARM template that the latest version of the Compute API https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/templates/microsoft.compute/virtualmachinescalesets |
|
@apeschel thanks for confirming this - I've requested that the Azure SDK for Go is upgraded to use this new API version Thanks! |
|
@tombuildsstuff A caveat to be aware of when updating the CustomData for a VMSS -- it will not update on existing hosts, only new hosts. There does not appear to be any way to get waagent to pull the new CustomData, so you will need to reimage existing hosts if you want them to get the updated CustomData. This can be done manually with |
|
@apeschel indeed, however there's a |
|
@tombuildsstuff The danger with going that route is the VMSS may be a HA cluster of some kind where you don't want all your hosts to go down at once. A rolling reimage would be fine, but I believe |
tombuildsstuff
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2017
tombuildsstuff
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2017
sebastus
added a commit
to sebastus/terraform-provider-azurerm
that referenced
this issue
Dec 8, 2017
* Provision sample for ASP.NET on azure_rm_app_service * Added vnet datasource * add identity property to vm * refactor, tests and docs * added vnet_peering * changing to TypeMap * Updating the Provider block * Variable consistency and removing unused variables * Changed to azure_virtual_network, added crash control and added documentation. * vmss: Support for updating the customData field Fixes hashicorp#61 Fixes hashicorp#490 * Updating to include hashicorp#559 * Support for Auto Inflating ``` $ acctests azurerm TestAccAzureRMEventHubNamespace_maximumThroughputUnits === RUN TestAccAzureRMEventHubNamespace_maximumThroughputUnits --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMEventHubNamespace_maximumThroughputUnits (202.41s) PASS ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm 202.432s ``` * New Resource: `azurerm_network_watcher` ``` $ acctests azurerm TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_ === RUN TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_importBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_importBasic (75.79s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_importComplete --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_importComplete (69.85s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_basic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_basic (69.62s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_complete --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_complete (72.16s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_update --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_update (81.75s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_disappears --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMNetworkWatcher_disappears (94.38s) PASS ok ``` * Updating to include hashicorp#569 * Hotfix: upgrade packages under go-autorest to be v9.4.1. Intergrate with latest version of go-autorest to read access tokens through new way customized through environment variable. The old behavior on local shell will be kept. Notice: for Azure Cloud Shell user, please make sure that they're using latest patched provider. * Vendoring the Locks SDK * New Resource: `azurerm_management_lock` Note: As the Subscription specific Locks will break other tests; these tests need to be run individually. As such I've introduced the `TF_ACC_SUBSCRIPTION_PARALLEL_LOCK` environment variable for this purpose. Tests pass: ``` $ TF_ACC_SUBSCRIPTION_PARALLEL_LOCK=1 acctests azurerm TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_ === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importResourceGroupReadOnlyBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importResourceGroupReadOnlyBasic (61.52s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importResourceGroupReadOnlyComplete --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importResourceGroupReadOnlyComplete (58.75s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importResourceGroupCanNotDeleteBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importResourceGroupCanNotDeleteBasic (53.38s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importResourceGroupCanNotDeleteComplete --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importResourceGroupCanNotDeleteComplete (46.87s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importPublicIPCanNotDeleteBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importPublicIPCanNotDeleteBasic (80.46s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importPublicIPReadOnlyBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_importPublicIPReadOnlyBasic (68.53s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_resourceGroupReadOnlyBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_resourceGroupReadOnlyBasic (61.24s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_resourceGroupReadOnlyComplete --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_resourceGroupReadOnlyComplete (64.10s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_resourceGroupCanNotDeleteBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_resourceGroupCanNotDeleteBasic (72.49s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_resourceGroupCanNotDeleteComplete --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_resourceGroupCanNotDeleteComplete (113.71s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_publicIPReadOnlyBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_publicIPReadOnlyBasic (64.05s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_publicIPCanNotDeleteBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_publicIPCanNotDeleteBasic (94.53s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_subscriptionReadOnlyBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_subscriptionReadOnlyBasic (17.98s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_subscriptionCanNotDeleteBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMManagementLock_subscriptionCanNotDeleteBasic (15.20s) PASS ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm 872.839s ``` Fixes hashicorp#23 * Updating to include hashicorp#573 * Updating to include hashicorp#571 * Adding validation for the locks name Tests: ``` $ acctests azurerm TestValidateManagementLockName === RUN TestValidateManagementLockName --- PASS: TestValidateManagementLockName (0.00s) PASS ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm 0.020s ``` * Linting * Updating to include hashicorp#575 * Updating the changelog for consistency * removed tabs, used spaces * add test for issue hashicorp#450 * Updated the way user agent string gets assigned. * Changed code to make it more readable. * pr tweaks * Avoid out of index errors when flattening image data disks. * Updating to include hashicorp#587 * Updating to include hashicorp#589 * Conditional loading of the Subscription ID / Tenant ID / Environment * Refactoring the provider block to support determining the TenantID/Environment from the SubscriptionID Splitting out the authentication logic into a helpers folder Also adding unit tests for these - which pass: ``` $ go test . -v === RUN TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_InvalidDate --- PASS: TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_InvalidDate (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_Expired 2017/11/30 15:02:01 [DEBUG] Token "7cabcf30-8dca-43f9-91e6-fd56dfb8632f" has expired --- PASS: TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_Expired (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_ExpiringIn --- PASS: TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_ExpiringIn (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_InvalidManagementDomain 2017/11/30 15:02:01 [DEBUG] Resource "https://portal.azure.com/" isn't a management domain --- PASS: TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_InvalidManagementDomain (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_DifferentTenant 2017/11/30 15:02:01 [DEBUG] Resource "https://management.core.windows.net/" isn't for the correct Tenant --- PASS: TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_DifferentTenant (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_ValidFromCloudShell --- PASS: TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_ValidFromCloudShell (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_ValidFromAzureCLI --- PASS: TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_ValidFromAzureCLI (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_NoTokens --- PASS: TestAzureFindValidAccessTokenForTenant_NoTokens (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureCLIProfileFindDefaultSubscription --- PASS: TestAzureCLIProfileFindDefaultSubscription (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureCLIProfileFindSubscription --- PASS: TestAzureCLIProfileFindSubscription (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateSubscriptionFromCLIProfile_Missing --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateSubscriptionFromCLIProfile_Missing (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateSubscriptionFromCLIProfile_NoDefault --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateSubscriptionFromCLIProfile_NoDefault (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateSubscriptionFromCLIProfile_Default --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateSubscriptionFromCLIProfile_Default (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_Empty --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_Empty (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_MissingSubscription --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_MissingSubscription (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_PopulateEnvironment --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_PopulateEnvironment (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_NormaliseAndPopulateEnvironment --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_NormaliseAndPopulateEnvironment (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_PopulateTenantId --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_PopulateTenantId (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_Complete --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateTenantAndEnvironmentFromCLIProfile_Complete (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateFromAccessToken_Missing --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateFromAccessToken_Missing (0.00s) === RUN TestAzurePopulateFromAccessToken_Exists --- PASS: TestAzurePopulateFromAccessToken_Exists (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureEnvironmentNames --- PASS: TestAzureEnvironmentNames (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureValidateBearerAuth --- PASS: TestAzureValidateBearerAuth (0.00s) === RUN TestAzureValidateServicePrincipal --- PASS: TestAzureValidateServicePrincipal (0.00s) PASS ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm/helpers/authentication 0.012s ``` * Fixing the build * Remove the field marked as "Removed" according to hashicorp#572. * Upgrading to v11.2.2-beta of the Azure SDK for Go * Updating to include hashicorp#593 * Fixing the Management Lock validation * Adding a default value for the identity field * Updating to include hashicorp#482 * Updating to include hashicorp#574 * Adding settings to the hash Test passes: ``` $ acctests azurerm TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachineScaleSet_extensionUpdate === RUN TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachineScaleSet_extensionUpdate --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMVirtualMachineScaleSet_extensionUpdate (593.13s) PASS ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm 593.153s ``` * Updating to include hashicorp#609 * Local Network Gateways: support for BGP Settings ``` $ acctests azurerm TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_ === RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_importBasic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_importBasic (82.23s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_basic --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_basic (81.29s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_disappears --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_disappears (79.17s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_bgpSettings --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_bgpSettings (78.70s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_bgpSettingsDisable --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_bgpSettingsDisable (96.18s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_bgpSettingsEnable --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_bgpSettingsEnable (97.39s) === RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_bgpSettingsComplete --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_bgpSettingsComplete (79.68s) PASS ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm 594.680s ``` * Refactoring * Adding an import test for BGP Settings: ``` $ acctests azurerm TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_importBGPSettingsComplete === RUN TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_importBGPSettingsComplete --- PASS: TestAccAzureRMLocalNetworkGateway_importBGPSettingsComplete (80.96s) PASS ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-azurerm/azurerm 80.987s ``` * Splitting the data source out into it's own step * Minor refactoring * Updating to include hashicorp#533 * Exporting the Default Hostname field * Updating the App Service example to be complete This removes support for Publishing, since the SCM URL's aren't consistent across Sovereign Clouds (China/Germany/Govt etc) Switches to using the new `default_site_hostname` field introduced in hashicorp#612 rather than assuming what it is * Updating to include hashicorp#594 * Updating to include hashicorp#611 * Updating to include hashicorp#612 * Remove leading line break from key_vault_key docs Leading line break causes page metadata to be ignored.
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
This issue was originally opened by @lmickh as hashicorp/terraform#13547. It was migrated here as part of the provider split. The original body of the issue is below.
Terraform Version
Terraform v0.9.2
Affected Resource(s)
azurerm_virtual_machine_scale_set
Expected Behavior
Allow the update to the customData.
Actual Behavior
Get the following message:
Steps to Reproduce
Create an
azurerm_virtual_machine_scale_setresource with generated customData in the os_profile.Generate new customData (change a cloud-init template file or ignition resource for example)
Run
terraform applyagainst the scale set.Important Factoids
My understanding is that the Azure Compute API was updated to allow for changes to customData. A later version of the api ( > "2016-03-30" possibly "2016-08-30") may need to be used. I tried confirming the specific version of the change, but have had troubles do to the lack of documentation for the Azure API.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: