Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update data source azurerm_policy_definition: Make name as a possible input variable #6275

Conversation

ArcturusZhang
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #6249

And I temporarily removed the validation function of management group id, since it will never be a resource ID here, it should be an UUID or some proper name of a management group, rather than a full ID. (And a mgmt group full ID is also not a valid resource ID)

@ArcturusZhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Acc tests are passing:
image

@ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang force-pushed the add-new-for-data-source-policy-definition branch from c1026ff to 9190c06 Compare March 27, 2020 05:59
@katbyte katbyte self-assigned this Apr 7, 2020
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @ArcturusZhang,

Aside from a few minor comments i've left inline this looks good, should be good to merge once the they are addressed 🙂

@katbyte katbyte added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Apr 8, 2020
@ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang force-pushed the add-new-for-data-source-policy-definition branch from b869ea5 to 4b6ea99 Compare April 8, 2020 06:30
@ArcturusZhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @katbyte thanks for the review! I have made some changes that resolves those comments, and deprecate the old management_group_id field (both data source and resource) to align with the recent changes in management groups. Please have a look, thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this @ArcturusZhang! hope you don't mind but i pushed a couple changed to get this merged 🙂 LGTM !

@katbyte katbyte merged commit f88f2e4 into hashicorp:master Apr 9, 2020
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 9, 2020
@ArcturusZhang ArcturusZhang deleted the add-new-for-data-source-policy-definition branch April 10, 2020 03:18
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 16, 2020

This has been released in version 2.6.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.6.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 10, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@hashicorp hashicorp locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 10, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

data.azurerm_policy_definition lookup by definition_id
3 participants