New Resource: azurerm_kusto_database_principal_assignment

[jrauschenbusch]

fixes #7383

[jrauschenbusch]

@katbyte This is currently WIP. I'll need to check whether everything works correctly. After all we need to deprecate the old "azurerm_database_principal" resource and give a hint to the new available resource within the docs.

[jrauschenbusch]

@mbfrahry As it's the same structure as azurerm_kusto_cluster_principal_assignment it could make sense that you also review this one. Notes from the other PR are already applied.

[jackofallops]

Hi @jrauschenbusch
Many thanks for this new resource. It's looking really good, just a few minor changes below to address (some are items I'll be fixing up at a later date in the azurerm_kusto_cluster_principal_assignment resource which I'm guessing you based this on?)

One additional item not in the comments below, could you add a requiresImport acceptance test?

Thanks again!

[jrauschenbusch]

@jackofallops I've fixed everything and added the requiresImport acc test. And yes, everything was based on the azurerm_kusto_cluster_principal_assignment resource.

Please review again. I had to do a go mod vendor which updated the vendors folder. I don't know if the diffs should really be there. Please consider it within the review.

[jackofallops]

Tests passing:

[ghost]

This has been released in version 2.18.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.18.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!