Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add fields to loganalytics workspaces #9033

Merged

Conversation

dw511214992
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hi @dw511214992

Thanks for this PR.

I've taken a look through and left some comments inline - but if we can fix up the comments (and potentially update the field names to clarify what these actually do) then we should be able to take another look.

Thanks!

@dw511214992
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @tombuildsstuff thanks for your review. I have updated the pr accroding to your comments. Also, I reply your comments, and please check it.

@ghost ghost removed the waiting-response label Oct 28, 2020
@dw511214992
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @tombuildsstuff The private_link_scoped_resource has been removed. Please also help review other changes. Thanks

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dw511214992 - please see my comments inline

website/docs/r/log_analytics_workspace.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/r/log_analytics_workspace.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dw511214992
Copy link
Contributor Author

dw511214992 commented Nov 10, 2020

thanks @katbyte I have updated the pr based on your comments.

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, LGTM now 👍

website/docs/r/log_analytics_workspace.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@katbyte
Copy link
Collaborator

katbyte commented Nov 10, 2020

@dw511214992 - could you fix up the merge conflicts? once those are fixed this will be good to merge

# Conflicts:
#	azurerm/internal/services/loganalytics/log_analytics_workspace_resource.go
#	azurerm/internal/services/loganalytics/tests/log_analytics_workspace_resource_test.go
@dw511214992
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @katbyte The conflicts has been resolved. Please help merge this pr as I have no permission to merge it. thanks

@katbyte katbyte added this to the v2.36.0 milestone Nov 11, 2020
@katbyte katbyte merged commit 1ed9b6d into hashicorp:master Nov 11, 2020
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 12, 2020

This has been released in version 2.36.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.36.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@LaurentLesle
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @dw511214992 is there a reason why private_link_scoped_resource has been removed in one of your commit? Looks like there is no more opened issues to track that feature @arnaudlh

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 11, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@hashicorp hashicorp locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 11, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants