New data source: azurerm_subscriptions #940
Conversation
katbyte
force-pushed
the
f-ds-subscriptions
branch
from
1a8ebc7
to
87229fb
Compare
katbyte
force-pushed
the
f-ds-subscriptions
branch
from
87229fb
to
3633361
Compare
| "spending_limit": { | ||
| Type: schema.TypeString, | ||
| Computed: true, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
do you think it's also worth exposing the TenantID here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The tenant will always be what the provider is using and accessible from client_config data source.
azurerm/data_source_subscriptions.go
Outdated
| if policies := val.SubscriptionPolicies; policies != nil { | ||
| s["location_placement_id"] = *policies.LocationPlacementID | ||
| s["quota_id"] = *policies.QuotaID | ||
| s["spending_limit"] = policies.SpendingLimit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should add nil checks around these, otherwise there's a potential crash
| ## Example Usage | ||
|
|
||
| ```hcl | ||
| data "azurerm_subscriptions" "availible" {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
minor availible -> available
| ```hcl | ||
| data "azurerm_subscriptions" "availible" {} | ||
|
|
||
| output "availible_subscriptions" { |
| value = "${data.azurerm_subscriptions.current.subscriptions}" | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| output "first_availible_subscription_display_name" { |
| return map[string]*schema.Schema{ | ||
| "subscription_id": { | ||
| Type: schema.TypeString, | ||
| Optional: true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Given this is only optional for the Subscription Data Source - I believe we don't want this set for the Subscriptions Data Source? We can override the schema for the Subscription data source to add this, there's examples in the AWS Provider
…cks and corrected schema
| @@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ import ( | |||
| "github.com/hashicorp/terraform/helper/schema" | |||
| ) | |||
|
|
|||
| func SubscriptionSchema() map[string]*schema.Schema { | |||
| return map[string]*schema.Schema{ | |||
| func SubscriptionSchema(subscriptionIdOptional bool) map[string]*schema.Schema { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
super minor, but use ID (see https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#initialisms)
|
Updated with requested changes. |
|
Tests pass: |
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
No description provided.