Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_dns_cname_record: try normalize target_resource_id with RecordTypeID before set to state #24181

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 25, 2024

Conversation

wuxu92
Copy link
Contributor

@wuxu92 wuxu92 commented Dec 11, 2023

fixes: #24138.

There is a nother API casing issue related to this resource: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#6641 so change the acctest resource group name to lower case to make the acc test work.

image

@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ func resourceDnsCNameRecordRead(d *pluginsdk.ResourceData, meta interface{}) err
if props.TargetResource != nil && props.TargetResource.Id != nil {
targetResourceId = *props.TargetResource.Id
}
d.Set("target_resource_id", targetResourceId)
d.Set("target_resource_id", normalizeTargetResourceID(targetResourceId))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're only calling this once so it doesn't need to be a separate function. Can you please in-line the ID parsing above. We should also be raising the error from the parser instead of silently ignoring.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure! Updated.

Comment on lines 194 to 196
if parsedID, err := recordsets.ParseRecordTypeIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = parsedID.ID()
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wuxu92 We still need to return the error here since we're expecting a record type ID. If the service suddenly begins returning an ID of a completely different type we would never know.

Suggested change
if parsedID, err := recordsets.ParseRecordTypeIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = parsedID.ID()
}
parsedID, err := recordsets.ParseRecordTypeIDInsensitively(targetResourceId)
if err != nil {
return err
}
targetResourceId = parsedID.ID()

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no document stating that the target resource ID must be a DNS record type ID. As far as I understand, it can refer to other Azure resources.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @wuxu92 - I don't think this is the correct way to handle the reported issue. The target ref is intended for only a handful of resource types:
image
I think the user should be using record not target_resource_id in the configuration? Can you try a repro that way to see if the issue is resolved that way? Since the record property is supposed to be another DNS record, this would be a more stable place to work with any casing mitigations if they are still required.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @jackofallops I have repro with record field and it works well! FWIW should we still normalize the target_resource_id as we can with all these possible resource types?

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @wuxu92. This is almost good to go, could you please take a look at the latest comment?

Comment on lines +197 to +205
if recordTypeID, err := recordsets.ParseRecordTypeIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = recordTypeID.ID()
} else if trafficManagerID, err := endpoints.ParseEndpointTypeIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = trafficManagerID.ID()
} else if cdnID, err := cdn.EndpointIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = cdnID.ID()
} else if frontDoorID, err := frontdoor.FrontendEndpointIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = frontDoorID.ID()
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're still silently ignoring the case where the returned ID is none of those resource types. We should error if the resource type isn't any of these.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the resource type is not listed, we should directly use the ID from the API response. This could indicate an API bug or a new resource type supported by the API. Neither of these scenarios should disrupt client behavior, as far as I understand it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I needed to check internally but you're right @wuxu92, apologies!

I did push a commit to add a comment above this logic linking to a piece of work we're doing on dynamic resource IDs - once that functionality is available we should be able to update this.

@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Member

x-ref to the recaser in: hashicorp/go-azure-helpers#189

Copy link
Member

@stephybun stephybun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @wuxu92 LGTM 👍

Comment on lines +197 to +205
if recordTypeID, err := recordsets.ParseRecordTypeIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = recordTypeID.ID()
} else if trafficManagerID, err := endpoints.ParseEndpointTypeIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = trafficManagerID.ID()
} else if cdnID, err := cdn.EndpointIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = cdnID.ID()
} else if frontDoorID, err := frontdoor.FrontendEndpointIDInsensitively(targetResourceId); err == nil {
targetResourceId = frontDoorID.ID()
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I needed to check internally but you're right @wuxu92, apologies!

I did push a commit to add a comment above this logic linking to a piece of work we're doing on dynamic resource IDs - once that functionality is available we should be able to update this.

@stephybun stephybun merged commit 6b1e66a into hashicorp:main Jan 25, 2024
30 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.90.0 milestone Jan 25, 2024
stephybun added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
rizkybiz pushed a commit to rizkybiz/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
…ecordTypeID before set to state (hashicorp#24181)

* try normalize dns target resource id to fix case issue

* use lowercase resource group name to fix acc tests

* inline normalize target resource id

* add other possible resource id for target resource id

* add todo comment for updating the id parser logic once the recaser work is finished

---------

Co-authored-by: Steph <steph@hashicorp.com>
rizkybiz pushed a commit to rizkybiz/terraform-provider-azurerm that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
dduportal pushed a commit to jenkins-infra/azure that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2024
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>changes detected:&#xA;&#x9;&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from
&#34;3.89.0&#34; to &#34;3.90.0&#34; in file
&#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.90.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.90.0&#xA;UPGRADE
NOTES:&#xA;&#xA;* provider - The provider will now automatically
register the `AppConfiguration`, `DataFactory`, and `SignalRService`
Resource Providers. When running Terraform with limited permissions,
note that you [must disable automatic Resource Provider Registration and
ensure that any Resource Providers Terraform requires are
registered]([XXX](https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/azurerm/latest/docs#skip_provider_registration)).
([#24645](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24645))&#xA;
&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;* **New Data Source**:
`azurerm_nginx_configuration`
([#24642](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24642))&#xA;*
**New Data Source**: `azurerm_virtual_desktop_workspace`
([#24732](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24732))&#xA;*
**New Resource**: `azurerm_kubernetes_fleet_update_strategy`
([#24328](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24328))&#xA;*
**New Resource**: `azurerm_site_recovery_vmware_replicated_vm`
([#22477](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/22477))&#xA;*
**New Resource**:
`azurerm_spring_cloud_new_relic_application_performance_monitoring`
([#24699](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24699))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
provider: registering the Resource Provider `Microsoft.AppConfiguration`
([#24645](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24645))&#xA;*
provider: registering the Resource Provider `Microsoft.DataFactory`
([#24645](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24645))&#xA;*
provider: registering the Resource Provider `Microsoft.SignalRService`
([#24645](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24645))&#xA;*
provider: the Provider is now built using Go 1.21.6
([#24653](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24653))&#xA;*
dependencies: the dependency `github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` has
been split into multiple Go Modules - and as such will be referred to by
those paths going forwards
([#24636](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24636))&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to ``v0.20240201.1064937` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk/resource-manager`
([#24738](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24738))&#xA;*
dependencies: updating to `v0.20240201.1064937` of
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk/sdk`
([#24738](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24738))&#xA;*
`appservice`: update to `go-azure-sdk` and API version `2023-01-01`
([#24688](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24688))&#xA;*
`datafactory`: updating to use `tombuildsstuff/kermit`
([#24675](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24675))&#xA;*
`hdinsight`: refactoring to use
`github.com/hashicorp/go-azure-sdk/resource-manager`
([#24011](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24011))&#xA;*
`hdinsight`: updating to API Version `2021-06-01`
([#24011](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24011))&#xA;*
`loadbalancer`: updating to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#24291](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24291))&#xA;*
`nginx`: updating to API Version `2023-09-01`
([#24640](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24640))&#xA;*
`servicefabricmanagedcluster`: updating to use the base layer from
`hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` rather than `Azure/go-autorest`
([#24654](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24654))&#xA;*
`springcloud`: updating to use API Version `2023-11-01-preview`
([#24690](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24690))&#xA;*
`subscriptions`: refactoring to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk`
([#24663](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24663))&#xA;*
Data Source: `azurerm_stream_analytics_job` - support for User Assigned
Identities
([#24738](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24738))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - support for the `gremlin_database` and
`tables_to_restore` properties
([#24627](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24627))&#xA;*
`azurerm_bot_channel_email` - support for the `magic_code` property
([#23129](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/23129))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cosmosdb_account` - support for the `partition_merge_enabled`
property
([#24615](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24615))&#xA;*
`azurerm_mssql_managed_database` - support for the
`immutable_backups_enabled` property
([#24745](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24745))&#xA;*
`azurerm_mssql_database` - support for the `immutable_backups_enabled`
property
([#24745](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24745))&#xA;*
`azurerm_palo_alto_next_generation_firewall_virtual_hub_panorama` -
support for the `trusted_address_ranges` property
([#24459](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24459))&#xA;*
`azurerm_palo_alto_next_generation_firewall_virtual_network_local_rulestack`
- support for the `trusted_address_ranges` property
([#24459](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24459))&#xA;*
`azurerm_palo_alto_next_generation_firewall_virtual_network_panorama` -
support for the `trusted_address_ranges` property
([#24459](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24459))&#xA;*
`azurerm_servicebus_namespace` - updating to use API Version
`2022-10-01-preview`
([#24650](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24650))&#xA;*
`azurerm_spring_cloud_api_portal` - support for the
`api_try_out_enabled` property
([#24696](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24696))&#xA;*
`azurerm_spring_cloud_gateway` - support for the
`local_response_cache_per_route` and `local_response_cache_per_instance`
properties
([#24697](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24697))&#xA;*
`azurerm_stream_analytics_job` - support for User Assigned Identities
([#24738](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24738))&#xA;*
`azurerm_subscription` - refactoring to use `hashicorp/go-azure-sdk` to
set tags on the subscription
([#24734](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24734))&#xA;*
`azurerm_virtual_desktop_workspace` - correctly validate the `name`
property
([#24668](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24668))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* provider: skip registration for resource providers
that are unavailable
([#24571](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24571))&#xA;*
`azurerm_app_configuration` - no longer require
`lifecycle_ignore_changes` for the `value` property when using a key
vault reference
([#24702](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24702))&#xA;*
`azurerm_app_service_managed_certificate` - fix casing issue in
`app_service_plan_id` by parsing insensitively
([#24664](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24664))&#xA;*
`azurerm_cognitive_deployment` - updates now include the `version`
property
([#24700](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24700))&#xA;*
`azurerm_dns_cname_record` - prevent casing issue in
`target_resource_id` by parsing the ID insensitively
([#24181](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24181))&#xA;*
`azurerm_mssql_managed_instance_failover_group` - prevent an issue when
trying to create a failover group with a managed instance from a
different subscription
([#24646](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24646))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_account` - conditionally update properties only when
needed
([#24669](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/24669))&#xA;*
`azurerm_storage_account` - change update order for `access_tier`to
prevent errors when uploading blobs to the archive tier
([#22250](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/22250))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/terraform-jobs/job/azure/job/main/1075/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 27, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

azurerm_dns_cname_record dnsZone case sensitivty causing drift
4 participants