Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tfe_workspace: add structured_run_output_enabled #330

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 23, 2021

Conversation

radditude
Copy link
Member

@radditude radditude commented Jun 22, 2021

Description

Add support for enabling the new redesigned apply UI for a workspace (structured_run_output_enabled). See #327 and hashicorp/go-tfe#233.

Testing plan

  1. Ensure that toggling structured_run_output_enabled on a workspace changes the setting appropriately.

External links

blog post

@radditude radditude force-pushed the radditude/structured-run-output branch 2 times, most recently from 7787f5e to 340d076 Compare June 23, 2021 01:59
@radditude radditude force-pushed the radditude/structured-run-output branch from 340d076 to 72381ae Compare June 23, 2021 02:00
@@ -59,11 +59,31 @@ func dataSourceTFEWorkspace() *schema.Resource {
Computed: true,
},

"policy_check_failures": {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't resist an opportunity to alphabetize.

@radditude radditude marked this pull request as ready for review June 23, 2021 02:31
@radditude radditude requested a review from a team June 23, 2021 02:31
Copy link
Contributor

@omarismail omarismail left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

few comments/suggestions, otherwise LGTM

✅ 🚢

@radditude radditude merged commit 780b34d into main Jun 23, 2021
@radditude radditude deleted the radditude/structured-run-output branch June 23, 2021 21:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants