Modify Hashie::Mash#respond_to? to work properly with delegation library #20
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…lude_private argument - needed to work properly with Ruby's DelegateClass and friends
mbleigh
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2011
Modify Hashie::Mash#respond_to? to work properly with delegation library
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello Michael,
I'm working on a new gem that utilizes your Hashie gem (great tool, by the way!). As you can see in the specs for this pull request, I'm trying to wrap a Hashie::Mash instance in a DelegateClass instance (from Ruby's delegate.rb). Please take a look at the pull request when you get a chance. I think it's fairly low-risk.
Thanks!
Ryan
enhance Hashie::Mash#respond_to? so that it supports the optional include_private argument - needed to work properly with Ruby's DelegateClass and friends