Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add lower bound for tasty-quickcheck #520

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2022
Merged

Add lower bound for tasty-quickcheck #520

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2022

Conversation

Bodigrim
Copy link
Contributor

Otherwise with tasty-quickcheck-0.8.0.3 we get

[ 8 of 15] Compiling QuickCheckUtils [Test.Tasty.QuickCheck changed]

tests/QuickCheckUtils.hs:107:32: error:
    Not in scope: type constructor or class ‘Gen’
    |
107 | sizedShortByteString :: Int -> Gen SB.ShortByteString
    |                                ^^^

@Bodigrim Bodigrim added this to the 0.11.4.0 milestone Jun 18, 2022
@Bodigrim Bodigrim requested a review from sjakobi June 18, 2022 16:26
sjakobi
sjakobi approved these changes Jun 19, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@sjakobi sjakobi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@Bodigrim Bodigrim merged commit 4e62154 into haskell:master Jun 19, 2022
@Bodigrim Bodigrim deleted the tasty-quickcheck branch June 19, 2022 13:34
sjakobi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
@Bodigrim @sjakobi
Add lower bound for tasty-quickcheck (#520)
f82406e 
(cherry picked from commit 4e62154)
sjakobi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2022
@Bodigrim @sjakobi
Add lower bound for tasty-quickcheck (#520)
67b3ed6 
(cherry picked from commit 4e62154)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sjakobi sjakobi sjakobi approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.11.4.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@Bodigrim @sjakobi