Clarify replicateM Haddock #956
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The CI error is |
treeowl
reviewed
Jul 6, 2023
tomjaguarpaw
force-pushed
the
replicateM-haddock
branch
from
d2a901d
to
7323df2
Compare
|
Thanks! I'll merge once CI completes. |
|
I believe this is ready for merge. |
treeowl
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2023
|
Sorry I'm being sluggish. I've been sick with COVID for a week, which explains some of it.... |
|
That's OK. Hope you feel better soon! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
"
replicateMis a sequence counterpart ofreplicateM" doesn't really make much sense, so this PR clarifies it.Before
After