Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge 0.7 #994

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Merge 0.7 #994

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

treeowl
Copy link
Contributor

@treeowl treeowl commented Mar 8, 2024

No description provided.

I missed some important contributions and contributors.
@meooow25 meooow25 mentioned this pull request Mar 10, 2024
@meooow25
Copy link
Contributor

Resolving dependencies...
Error: cabal-3.10.2.0: Could not resolve dependencies:
[__0] trying: containers-0.7 (user goal)
[__1] trying: base-4.16.4.0/installed-4.16.4.0 (dependency of containers)
[__2] trying: containers-tests-0 (user goal)
[__3] trying: nothunks-0.2.1.0 (dependency of containers-tests)
[__4] next goal: ghc-heap (dependency of nothunks)
[__4] rejecting: ghc-heap-9.2.8/installed-9.2.8 (conflict: containers==0.7, ghc-heap => containers==0.6.5.1/installed-0.6.5.1)
[__4] rejecting: ghc-heap-9.8.1 (conflict: containers==0.7, ghc-heap => containers>=0.6.2.1 && <0.7)
[__4] skipping: ghc-heap-9.6.3, ghc-heap-9.6.1, ghc-heap-9.4.1, ghc-heap-9.2.2, ghc-heap-9.2.1 (has the same characteristics that caused the previous version to fail: excludes 'containers' version 0.7)
[__4] rejecting: ghc-heap-9.0.1 (conflict: base => ghc-prim==0.8.0/installed-0.8.0, ghc-heap => ghc-prim>0.2 && <0.8)
[__4] fail (backjumping, conflict set: base, containers, ghc-heap, nothunks)
After searching the rest of the dependency tree exhaustively, these were the goals I've had most trouble fulfilling: containers, base, ghc-heap, nothunks, containers-tests

@treeowl from the logs the failure seems to be because ghc-heap does not allow containers-0.7:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/ghc-heap

@treeowl
Copy link
Contributor Author

treeowl commented Mar 10, 2024

Thanks, @meooow25 . @bgamari , is this just a matter of bumping the Hackage bounds for ghc-heap?

@Bodigrim
Copy link
Contributor

To speed things up I made a revision: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/ghc-heap-9.8.1/revisions/

Now fc3a61a passes CI: https://github.com/haskell/containers/actions/runs/8198216367/job/22485297613

@treeowl I think you can revert changes to CI in 5f8b8a2 and go ahead with a merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants