Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run the benchmark suite on GHC 9.2.3 #3069

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Aug 2, 2022
Merged

Run the benchmark suite on GHC 9.2.3 #3069

merged 6 commits into from Aug 2, 2022

Conversation

pepeiborra
Copy link
Collaborator

@pepeiborra pepeiborra commented Jul 30, 2022

As @kokobd noticed in #3046 the benchmark suite is not running in 9.x

Cabal 3.0.0.0 doesn't build with GHC 9.2.x
@pepeiborra pepeiborra mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2022
@pepeiborra pepeiborra enabled auto-merge (squash) July 30, 2022 15:32
@pepeiborra pepeiborra changed the title Run the benchmark suite on GHC 9.0.2 and 9.2.3 Run the benchmark suite on GHC 9.2.3 Jul 31, 2022
@pepeiborra
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I don't know what's up with the upload-artefact action, it keeps randomly failing to upload the .cabal folder artefact (around 250MB) produced by building the benchmark suite to Github CI. 400 and 503 status codes from https://pipelines.actions.githubusercontent.com.

Hard to tell whether this is a temporary infra issue or there's something else.

@pepeiborra pepeiborra requested a review from kokobd August 2, 2022 14:43
Copy link
Collaborator

@kokobd kokobd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thank you!

@pepeiborra pepeiborra merged commit f3225ad into master Aug 2, 2022
sloorush pushed a commit to sloorush/haskell-language-server that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2022
* Run the benchmark suite in GHC 9.0.2 and 9.2.3

* Benchmark Cabal 3.6.3.0

Cabal 3.0.0.0 doesn't build with GHC 9.2.x
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants