Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Read only of REPL prompt in Inf-Haskell #493

Closed
m00nlight opened this issue Mar 6, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Read only of REPL prompt in Inf-Haskell #493

m00nlight opened this issue Mar 6, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@m00nlight
Copy link
Contributor

It should be nice to make the repl prompt in Inf-haskell buffer not deletable like in the eshell mode.

@gracjan
Copy link
Contributor

gracjan commented Mar 6, 2015

@m00nlight: you see to know what you want and know how to copy paste relevant fragment from eshell. How about a pull request?

@m00nlight
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gracjan OK. I will try to patch a pull request.

@gracjan
Copy link
Contributor

gracjan commented Mar 8, 2015

@m00nlight: great!

@m00nlight
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gracjan After some investigation, I found that inf-haskell-mode is depreciated. It is replaced by interactive-haskell-mode which can configured with the following link:

https://github.com/haskell/haskell-mode/wiki/Haskell-Interactive-Mode-Setup

And the prompt of interactive-haskell-mode is read-only by default. So do we still need to patch
the depreciated inf-haskell-mode? Or should we just to update the configure tutorial on haskell wiki
and make more clear document in the repository?

[1] https://wiki.haskell.org/Emacs
[2] https://wiki.haskell.org/Emacs/Inferior_Haskell_processes

@gracjan
Copy link
Contributor

gracjan commented Mar 8, 2015

@m00nlight: updates to instructions are way more important than fixing old code. Can you do that?

@m00nlight
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gracjan OK. No problem. I will update the configuration tutorial.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants