Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-implement java client with NIO #1391

Closed
gurbuzali opened this issue Dec 16, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

Re-implement java client with NIO #1391

gurbuzali opened this issue Dec 16, 2013 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee Team: Client Type: Enhancement
Milestone

Comments

@gurbuzali
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ghost ghost assigned gurbuzali Dec 16, 2013
Danny-Hazelcast added a commit to Danny-Hazelcast/hazelcast that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2013
@Danny-Hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

Tests

com.hazelcast.client.io.ClientIOExecutorPoolSizeLowTest

Failing test marked with @ignore("Issue #1391")

@mikojava
Copy link

nice

@Danny-Hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

while rerunning the Test after Issue was closed I find that

on client.getLifecycleService().shutdown();

java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: Task com.hazelcast.client.spi.impl.ClientCallFuture$ReSendTask@45ba967e rejected from java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor@7e956b74[Terminated, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 2020]

@Danny-Hazelcast
Copy link
Contributor

The test all pass its only now an issue shutting down the client after each test

@mmedenjak mmedenjak added the Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee label Jan 28, 2020
devOpsHazelcast pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2024
…1391)

GitOrigin-RevId: 6b10eaa89fc4308a1667a2853dbf67a4c33b6b2b
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee Team: Client Type: Enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants