Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement distributed BiMap #36

Closed
hazelcast opened this issue Mar 23, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Implement distributed BiMap #36

hazelcast opened this issue Mar 23, 2012 · 4 comments
Labels
Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee Type: Enhancement

Comments

@hazelcast
Copy link
Collaborator

It would be quite useful to have not only distributed Map and MultiMap collections, but also BiMap.

Migrated from http://code.google.com/p/hazelcast/issues/detail?id=484
@micklev
Copy link

micklev commented Oct 25, 2012

Hi, is there any chance to have distributed BiMap implementation in hazelcast?

@enesakar
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, but currently team is concentrated on 3.0 which will provide an
infrastructure that is easy to develop new data structures like BiMap.

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Michael Trofimov <notifications@github.com

wrote:

Hi, is there any chance to have distributed BiMap implementation in
hazelcast?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/36#issuecomment-9770778.

Enes Akar
Hazelcast | Open source in-memory data grid
Mobile: +90.505.394.1668

@mdogan
Copy link
Contributor

mdogan commented Aug 28, 2013

With 3.0 SPI one can easily implement this feature. No plan to support this feature at the moment.

@mdogan mdogan closed this as completed Aug 28, 2013
ahmetmircik referenced this issue in ahmetmircik/hazelcast Jun 8, 2015
@jerrinot
Merge pull request #36 from gAmUssA/rest-example
fc58148 
added rest client example
@hhimanshu
Copy link

Any accomplished this? Does anyone has ideas on how to implement BiDi Map?

@gurbuzali gurbuzali mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2015
Closed
@mmedenjak mmedenjak added the Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee label Jan 28, 2020
omidp added a commit to omidp/hazelcast that referenced this issue Feb 24, 2020
@omidp
Eureka url can not be set from xml config hazelcast#36
ead0ae1
omidp pushed a commit to omidp/hazelcast that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2020
Eureka url can not be set from xml config hazelcast#36
cd04bcf
Holmistr pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2020
@omidp
Eureka url can not be set from xml config #36
a1c2a78
Holmistr pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2020
Eureka url can not be set from xml config #36
ec99128
SeriyBg pushed a commit to SeriyBg/hazelcast that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2021
@dependabot
Bump nexus-staging-maven-plugin from 1.6.3 to 1.6.8 (hazelcast#36)
b941ab8 
Bumps nexus-staging-maven-plugin from 1.6.3 to 1.6.8.

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
SeriyBg pushed a commit to SeriyBg/hazelcast that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2021
@lazerion
hazelcastGH-36 required fix for hazelcast#36
bd75c3a
SeriyBg pushed a commit to SeriyBg/hazelcast that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2021
@lazerion
hazelcastGH-36 removal of redundant deps
b694bbc
SeriyBg pushed a commit to SeriyBg/hazelcast that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2021
Merge pull request hazelcast#37 from lazerion/hazelcastGH-36
38eb6b2 
hazelcastGH-36 required fix for hazelcast#36
SeriyBg pushed a commit to SeriyBg/hazelcast that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2021
@dependabot
Bump hazelcast from 4.0 to 4.0.2 (hazelcast#36)
ef52e92 
Bumps [hazelcast](https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast) from 4.0 to 4.0.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast/releases)
- [Commits](hazelcast/hazelcast@v4.0...v4.0.2)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Source: Internal PR or issue was opened by an employee Type: Enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@micklev @enesakar @mdogan @hhimanshu @mmedenjak