Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NearCacheTest.testGetAll[batchInvalidationEnabled:true] #7285

Closed
hasancelik opened this issue Jan 11, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@hasancelik
Copy link
Contributor

commented Jan 11, 2016

java.lang.AssertionError: Near cache hits should be > 400 but were 371
    at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
    at org.junit.Assert.assertTrue(Assert.java:41)
    at com.hazelcast.map.nearcache.NearCacheTest.testGetAll(NearCacheTest.java:437)

https://hazelcast-l337.ci.cloudbees.com/view/Official%20Builds/job/Hazelcast-3.x-OracleJDK1.6/com.hazelcast$hazelcast/784/testReport/junit/com.hazelcast.map.nearcache/NearCacheTest/testGetAll_batchInvalidationEnabled_true_/

@hasancelik

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Feb 26, 2016

java.lang.AssertionError: Near cache hits should be 481 but were 400 expected:<481> but was:<400>
    at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
    at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
    at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
    at com.hazelcast.map.nearcache.NearCacheTest.testGetAll(NearCacheTest.java:450)

https://hazelcast-l337.ci.cloudbees.com/view/Official%20Builds/job/Hazelcast-3.x-IbmJDK1.7/com.hazelcast$hazelcast/833/testReport/junit/com.hazelcast.map.nearcache/NearCacheTest/testGetAll_batchInvalidationEnabled_true_/

@hasancelik

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Mar 7, 2016

java.lang.AssertionError: Near cache hits should be 491 but were 428 expected:<491> but was:<428>
    at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
    at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
    at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
    at com.hazelcast.map.nearcache.NearCacheTest.testGetAll(NearCacheTest.java:450)

https://hazelcast-l337.ci.cloudbees.com/view/Official%20Builds/job/Hazelcast-3.maintenance-OracleJDK1.6/com.hazelcast$hazelcast/355/testReport/junit/com.hazelcast.map.nearcache/NearCacheTest/testGetAll_batchInvalidationEnabled_true_/

@hasancelik

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented May 26, 2016

java.lang.AssertionError: Near cache hits should be 498 but were 440 expected:<498> but was:<440>
    at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
    at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
    at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
    at com.hazelcast.map.nearcache.NearCacheTest.testGetAll(NearCacheTest.java:452)

https://hazelcast-l337.ci.cloudbees.com/view/Official%20Builds/job/Hazelcast-3.x-IbmJDK1.7/com.hazelcast$hazelcast/921/testReport/junit/com.hazelcast.map.nearcache/NearCacheTest/testGetAll_batchInvalidationEnabled_true_/

@ahmetmircik

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented May 30, 2016

Fixed via b688d4f

@hasancelik

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

commented Jun 28, 2016

maintenance

java.lang.AssertionError: Near cache hits should be 510 but were 501 expected:<510> but was:<501>
    at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
    at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
    at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
    at com.hazelcast.map.nearcache.NearCacheTest.testGetAll(NearCacheTest.java:452)

https://hazelcast-l337.ci.cloudbees.com/view/Official%20Builds/job/Hazelcast-3.maintenance/com.hazelcast$hazelcast/1344/testReport/junit/com.hazelcast.map.nearcache/NearCacheTest/testGetAll_batchInvalidationEnabled_true_/

@hasancelik hasancelik reopened this Jun 28, 2016

@hasancelik hasancelik modified the milestones: 3.6.5, 3.7 Jun 28, 2016

@ahmetmircik

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

commented Jun 28, 2016

should be fixed by b41c380

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.