GUI differences and Metadata differences ALMA/ALEPH

[TobiasNx]

Der Spiegel is an example that shows differences between old ALEPH GUI and ALMA GUI, also it highlights some of the metadata problems:

http://lobid.org/resources/990054089950206441
http://aleph.lobid.org/resources/HT001387709

Also Spiegel is an big example, that breaks the testing. It is 3,5 MB in contrast to some kb.

• Improve medium:Print mapping #2009
• Newspaper always a Periodical? #1991
• Has multiple publication-objects IMprovement in ALMA
• << and >> in alternativeTitel ALEPH // better in ALMA, therefore okay.
• strange bibliographicCitation in ALMA #2012
• strange containsExampleOfWork in ALEPH
• Augstein Begründer: Beitragender in ALEPH und Other in ALMA // seems to be no issue anymore.
• "label": "lobid-resources – Der hbz-Verbundkatalog als Linked Open Data" in ALMA schein falsch
• ISSN in ALMA not uniq
• secondaryPublication Event mapping seems to have changed from aleph to alma => less info #2011
• related.labels, altLabels and supplement.label still have >> and << in ALMA #1989
• issn in related has still - ALMA
• culturegraph links are missing in ALMA, should be able to reconstruct in ALMA now that HT number are available too
• in ALMA 030 CODEN Designation is missing in shortTitle #2014
• Formschlagwörter have been dropped in ALEPH, but this seems to be due to changes in the RSWK rules
• DDC is missing in ALMA
• Supplements names are missing subtitles. We should be combined $t and $b #1994
• Linked "Bände" and "Enthält" are not in GUI ALMA #1992 GUI shows subordinates and containedIn links, in ALEPH but not in ALMA GUI.
• not sure if holdings are missing in GUI

[TobiasNx]

Closing this ticket, since almost all issues are solved or follow up tickets are provided.