Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral Key Exchange DoS Vulnerability (SSL/TLS, D(HE)ater) #171

Closed
BrendanBTO opened this issue Aug 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@BrendanBTO
Copy link

I saw that the below 2 ciphers are ranked as secure on their respective pages. We have a vulnerability scanning tool which flagged them as being vulnerable to the below mentioned DoS vulnerability.

TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384

https://ciphersuite.info/search/?q=TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA

CVE-2002-20001
CVE-2022-40735

https://github.com/Balasys/dheater

https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2002-20001

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anton-Stiglic-2/publication/2401745_Security_Issues_in_the_Diffie-Hellman_Key_Agreement_Protocol

The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive incases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must claim that it can only communicate with DHE, and the server must be configured to allow DHE.

@n0lz
Copy link
Collaborator

n0lz commented Aug 8, 2023

Thanks for the info. We will look into it.

@n0lz n0lz self-assigned this Aug 8, 2023
hcrudolph added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants