You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At now UX for importing single config is too hard: users must fill full path to config file (not relative, but full from root!), or pass folder (with path from root too?) in separate argument. In command documentation there are two examples:
If user fill only config name (without .yml suffix that can be easily copy-pasted from mass config:import output) - automatically add suffix and lookup file in default config folder (maybe with --name attribute, like in ces command, but better without it):
At now UX for importing single config is too hard: users must fill full path to config file (not relative, but full from root!), or pass folder (with path from root too?) in separate argument. In command documentation there are two examples:
Why so hard?
So please add simpler ways to pass single config names:
.yml
suffix that can be easily copy-pasted from massconfig:import
output) - automatically add suffix and lookup file in default config folder (maybe with--name
attribute, like inces
command, but better without it):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: