Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

page-intex #13

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 16, 2024
Merged

page-intex #13

merged 8 commits into from
Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

bartholomew-smith[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

PR automatically created

Copy link

@prplex prplex bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review completed. Posted 2 comments.

<title>{{ title }}</title>
</head>
<body>
{{ body|safe }}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There could be potential XSS (Cross-site scripting) security issues with using 'safe' filter, it allows rendering of HTML tags from user-input directly. Consider escaping the HTML content or using another way to prevent potential security risks.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Micro-Learning Topic: Cross-site scripting (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "Cross-site scripting"

What is this? (2min video)

Cross-site scripting vulnerabilities occur when unescaped input is rendered into a page displayed to the user. When HTML or script is included in the input, it will be processed by a user's browser as HTML or script and can alter the appearance of the page or execute malicious scripts in their user context.

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Helpful references

def test_handle_check_suite_requested(event):
with patch("src.app.handle_create_pull_request") as mock_handle_create_pull_request:
def test_handle_check_suite_requested(event, repository):
with patch("app.handle_create_pull_request") as mock_handle_create_pull_request:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the function signature for 'test_handle_check_suite_requested' has changed. Make sure the behavior of the test is still correct.

Copy link

Pull Request Report

Hello there! I've analyzed the changes in the pull request and here's a report for you:

Changes

  1. In README.md, the image source has been updated from img/bartholomew-logo.png to static/bartholomew-logo.png.
  2. In app.py, the following changes have been made:
    • The markdown module has been imported.
    • The render_template function has been imported from flask.
    • The handle_with_flask function in webhook_handler is now called with an additional argument use_default_index=False.
    • Two new routes have been added: / and /<path:filename>.
    • The index function has been defined to render the README.md file.
    • The file function has been defined to read and render the contents of a file.
  3. In requirements.txt, the Markdown package has been added.

Suggestions

  • It would be helpful to provide more descriptive commit messages to better understand the changes made.

Bugs

  • No bugs found.

Improvements

  • The index.html template could benefit from having a more descriptive title and a favicon. Consider adding a <title> tag and a favicon link in the <head> section of the template.

Rating

I would rate the code a 7 out of 10 based on the following criteria:

  • Readability: The code is generally readable, but more descriptive variable and function names could improve clarity.
  • Performance: The code appears to be efficient and doesn't have any obvious performance issues.
  • Security: No security concerns were identified in the code.

That's it for the report! Let me know if you need any further assistance. Have a great day!

heitorpolidoro and others added 2 commits January 16, 2024 15:41
This commit fixes the style issues introduced in b2ad53e according to the output
from Black and isort.

Details: #13
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

app.py Outdated
"""Convert a md file into HTML and return it"""
if not filename.endswith(".md"):
abort(404)
with open(filename) as f:

Check failure

Code scanning / SonarCloud

I/O function calls should not be vulnerable to path injection attacks High

Change this code to not construct the path from user-controlled data. See more on SonarCloud

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Micro-Learning Topic: Injection attack (Detected by phrase)

Matched on "injection attack"

Injection flaws, such as SQL, NoSQL, OS, and LDAP injection, occur when untrusted data is sent to an interpreter as part of a command or query. The attacker’s hostile data can trick the interpreter into executing unintended commands or accessing data without proper authorization. Source: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:OWASP_Top_Ten_Project

Try a challenge in Secure Code Warrior

Helpful references

heitorpolidoro
heitorpolidoro previously approved these changes Jan 16, 2024
Copy link
Owner

@heitorpolidoro heitorpolidoro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved by Self Approver

This commit fixes the style issues introduced in 6eded52 according to the output
from Black and isort.

Details: #13
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions

3 Security Hotspots
E Security Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

idea Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint SonarLint

Copy link
Owner

@heitorpolidoro heitorpolidoro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved by Self Approver

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed, but some issues were introduced.

8 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@bartholomew-smith bartholomew-smith bot merged commit 308c5ea into master Jan 16, 2024
11 checks passed
@bartholomew-smith bartholomew-smith bot deleted the page-intex branch January 16, 2024 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant