Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HIP23: Decouple Consensus From Gateways #101

Closed
jamiew opened this issue Dec 22, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #276
Closed

HIP23: Decouple Consensus From Gateways #101

jamiew opened this issue Dec 22, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #276

Comments

@jamiew
Copy link
Contributor

jamiew commented Dec 22, 2020

Author(s): @cvolkernick
Initial PR: #97
Start Date: 2020-12-15
Category: Technical

Rendered view:

https://github.com/helium/HIP/blob/master/0023-decouple-consensus-from-gateways.md

Summary:

This proposal changes the structure & process involved in forming consensus on the network, primarily by separating concerns of miners (providing verifiable coverage) and the consensus group (securing the network and forming blocks).

@rmichalo
Copy link

CG is currently the only incentive for lone wolf gateways to be on the network - they dont earn otherwise. this hip would kill that incentive. hips should attempt to solve one of two core problems for the network: 1- increase # of gateways / supply of network coverage or 2- increase demand for data usage. i think this hip does the opposite. while it might be an improvement, current net effect is likely negative. it is something to revisit when the network is more mature.

@jamiew
Copy link
Contributor Author

jamiew commented Jan 29, 2021

With the merger of #111, is this HIP still relevant? Should this be rolled into a "validators phase 2" proposal?

@cvolkernick
Copy link
Contributor

Yes @jamiew it needs to be renamed / reformed. It would be helpful if some of the more "finalized" concepts around validators could be updated accordingly as well.

@abhay
Copy link
Contributor

abhay commented Sep 6, 2021

Propose closing this as stale @jamiew?

jamiew added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2021
@jamiew jamiew closed this as completed Sep 14, 2021
jamiew added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 14, 2021
@jamiew jamiew reopened this Sep 14, 2021
@jamiew jamiew closed this as completed Sep 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants