Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HIP draft: omni-protocol PoC on Helium Network #269

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 31, 2021

Conversation

zer0tweets
Copy link
Contributor

Publishing HIP 37: Omni-Protocol PoC on Helium Network per earlier discussions in the community meeting and various discord channels.

Publishing HIP 37: Omni-Protocol PoC on Helium Network per earlier discussions in the community meeting and various discord channels.
@mfalkvidd
Copy link

mfalkvidd commented Aug 28, 2021

For the unlimited plan gaming

we propose to address the above by implementing a chain variable that would allow setting an upper limit on data transfer for each UE <> CBRS on a per operator basis.

Should we specify what happens when an UE reaches the limit? Are they denied access entirely? Or capped to a low speed?

Is the UE usage reset at any point (1st day of a new month for example)?

Is this a single chain variable, or can each operator have their own value?

@jamiew jamiew changed the title Create 0037-omni-protocol-PoC-on-helium-network.md HIP draft: omni-protocol PoC on Helium Network Aug 31, 2021
@jamiew jamiew added the draft label Aug 31, 2021
@jamiew
Copy link
Contributor

jamiew commented Aug 31, 2021

Proposal looks great. Making some minor formatting fixes and then officially numbering and merging for discussion

@jamiew jamiew mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2021
@jamiew
Copy link
Contributor

jamiew commented Aug 31, 2021

Please direct future questions and comments to this HIP's new tracking issue, #271

Authors – please tag #271 in future PRs

@jamiew jamiew merged commit 11f8cd2 into helium:master Aug 31, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants