Iot assertion fees

[charlesfayal]

Updating IoT Gateway assertion fees

[vincenzospaghetti]

Hi @charlesfayal - the community recently passed HIP 69 #458 to lower fees for 3 months, but it is not a permanent fee reduction, and the going consensus is that we should not reduce fees permanently. Is your proposal to reduce this permanently?

If so, you need to make the argument as to WHY this will benefit the network. Reducing fees has a direct correlation to a LOWER DAO Utility Score, which would not be a positive outcome for the IOT subDAO.

Can you spend some more time on this HIP? Please reach out to me directly if you would like some help editing.

[charlesfayal]

Hi,There are HIPs moving now to take on boarding fees out of Subdao scorers. Once those go through, this wouldn’t have an effect on subdao and be much easier to pass through, so I’m waiting on that.I know of HIP 69, but I don’t see any reason it should be temporary and why it shouldn’t also include onboarding.Thanks for the feedback!On Mar 22, 2023, at 12:00 PM, vincenzospaghetti ***@***.***> wrote: *Message sent from a system outside of UConn.* Hi @charlesfayal - the community recently passed HIP 69 #458 to lower fees for 3 months, but it is not a permanent fee reduction, and the going consensus is that we should not reduce fees permanently. Is your proposal to reduce this permanently? If so, you need to make the argument as to WHY this will benefit the network. Reducing fees has a direct correlation to a LOWER DAO Utility Score, which would not be a positive outcome for the IOT subDAO. Can you spend some more time on this HIP? Please reach out to me directly if you would like some help editing. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[waveform06]

@hiptron please close this HIP
agreed with author

[abhay]

Closing on behalf of HIP editors.