This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 15, 2019. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Fix unused result #12
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Disclaimer: I'm not a C programmer in what so ever way. ;-)
Wouldn't be nice to check for return value of
write
and name the function following your naming convention ofe_foobar
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand your concern here. A lot of the time in C we don’t do all of the error checking we could do because we assume that some calls never fail—in
e
I also don’t check for failures ofmalloc
/realloc
for instance. I’m also not so sure aboutfprintf
ing the error here, especially after the last call towrite
failed and considering that the user could redirect stderr, leading to weird artifacts on the screen (in the best case).As per the naming convention: the
e_<function>
convention is only really important for exported functions (as in, functions that are in the header) I feel, but I would agree that it’s less of a code smell to follow it regardless. I shall update it in the next commit.