Restore workarounds for LaTeXML issue 1274

chapters/packages.tex

@@ -65,20 +65,22 @@ \subsection{Importing Definitions from a Package}\doublelabel{importing-definiti
 
 % Note a syntactic form cannot be written as a single \lstinline due to LaTeXML problem reported here:
 %   https://github.com/brucemiller/LaTeXML/issues/1274 (marked as fixed as of commit 80d7940)
-% Instead, we need to break up the \lstinline at each piece of math (taking the opportunity to leave the whitespace
-% outside both \lstinline and math).
+% Instead, we need to break up the \lstinline in mysterious ways.  Be sure to check that the generated HTML
+% looks OK when making changes!
 
 \lstinline!import $\mathit{definitionname}$;! (qualified import of top-level definition)
 
-\lstinline!import $\mathit{packagename}$.$\mathit{definitionname}$;! (qualified import)
+\lstinline!import $\mathit{packagename}$.!% Break up \lstinline as workaround for LaTeXML issue described above.
+\lstinline!$\mathit{definitionname}$;! (qualified import)
 
 \lstinline!import $\mathit{packagename}$.{$\mathit{def}_{1}$, $\mathit{def}_{2}$, $\ldots$, $\mathit{def}_{n}$};! (multiple definition import)
 
 \lstinline!import $\mathit{packagename}$.*;! (unqualified import)
 
 \lstinline!import $\mathit{shortname}$ = $\mathit{definitionname}$;! (renaming import of top-level definition)
 
-\lstinline!import $\mathit{shortname}$ = $\mathit{packagename}$.$\mathit{definitionname}$;! (renaming import)
+\lstinline!import $\mathit{shortname}$ = $\mathit{packagename}$.!% Break up \lstinline as workaround for LaTeXML issue described above.
+\lstinline!$\mathit{definitionname}$;! (renaming import)
 
 Here $\mathit{packagename}$ is the fully qualified name of the imported package including possible dot notation and $\mathit{definitionname}$ is the name of an element in a package.  The multiple definition import is equivalent
 to multiple single definition imports with corresponding $\mathit{packagename}$ and definition names.