We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
a common pattern used in flatdata is too use a fixed value to indicate a missing field, e.g.
const u32 INVALID_INDEX = 0xFFFFFFFF; struct MyStruct { @const( INVALID_INDEX ) index : u32; }
I propose making this a use case that we should support properly:
@optional( <const_name> )
Option<T>/boost::optional/whatever
field_name_raw()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Duplicates #80
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
a common pattern used in flatdata is too use a fixed value to indicate a missing field, e.g.
I propose making this a use case that we should support properly:
@optional( <const_name> )
annotationOption<T>/boost::optional/whatever
getters/settersfield_name_raw()
?)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: