We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From w3c/webrtc-pc#275 (comment)
tl;dr: This avoids the temptation to write "snowball" dictionaries for the purpose of return values.
Member name collisions not from inheritance would be a compiler error.
Additional potential (mis?)use-case w3c/mediacapture-main#211 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The common base requirement is artificial I suppose.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Member name collisions don't have to be a compiler error either, really. As long as the caller can tell what sort of dictionary got returned...
No branches or pull requests
From w3c/webrtc-pc#275 (comment)
tl;dr: This avoids the temptation to write "snowball" dictionaries for the purpose of return values.
Member name collisions not from inheritance would be a compiler error.
Additional potential (mis?)use-case w3c/mediacapture-main#211 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: