fix: Improve feature and dependency rendering

[epage]

This matches a proposal in rust-lang/cargo#10681 for how to render features in cargo-add.

A bit unsure on the dependency rendering.

Fixes #26

[hi-rustin]

Thanks for working on this!

[hi-rustin]

I am curious what if we also keep the color here? For instance:

1. Enabled by user: + and colored
2. Enabled: colored
3. Disable: nothing

Because it seems hard to tell from the picture, which features are included in the features that are turned on by default(or by users).

[epage]

Was confused what you are talking about until I realized that we needed #142 to properly render the new style of output.

Does the new output change your thoughts?

[hi-rustin]

Looks good to me! Thank you.

[hi-rustin]

A bit unsure on the dependency rendering.

I am hesitant about whether we should use the symbol "+" or not. This might confuse the users as "+" usually indicates addition. I am uncertain if this will cause any confusion.

[epage]

I am hesitant about whether we should use the symbol "+" or not. This might confuse the users as "+" usually indicates addition. I am uncertain if this will cause any confusion.

I'd like to present the three states

• required deps
• activated optional deps
• inactive optional deps

Any other thoughts for doing so? Or should we give up and only do required vs optional?

[hi-rustin]

Looks good to me. Thanks! 👍

[hi-rustin]

Any other thoughts for doing so? Or should we give up and only do required vs optional?

I don't have a strong opinion on this. We can release it to see what others think.

[hi-rustin]

@epage Do you think this PR is ready to go? I am preparing for a new release.

[epage]

Yes, it is

[hi-rustin]

Thanks for working on this again! 🤟 🖤