Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OGM-1131 Control the dependency version of Apache Lucene explicitly, … #744

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 9, 2016

Conversation

Sanne
Copy link
Member

@Sanne Sanne commented Aug 9, 2016

@DavideD DavideD merged commit 71a373d into hibernate:master Aug 9, 2016
@Sanne Sanne deleted the OGM-1131 branch August 9, 2016 14:43
@@ -95,13 +95,12 @@
<artifactId>hibernate-envers</artifactId>
<optional>true</optional>
</dependency>
<!-- This is to satisfy Neo4J's custom Lucene,
not to be confused with the one used by Hibernate Search -->
<!-- This is to satisfy Neo4J's custom Lucene: might not match the needs of Hibernate Search -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this comment actually true any longer, now that it's only one version?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes the point is that each of these would otherwise bring their own
transitive dependency. There are minor mismatches, like in this case a
micro version although we can manage some other combinations too. The only
reasonable strategy is to manage this explicitly ourselves rather than who
comes first transient..

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, 09:50 Gunnar Morling, notifications@github.com wrote:

In modules/wildfly/pom.xml
#744 (comment)
:

@@ -95,13 +95,12 @@
hibernate-envers
true

  •    <!-- This is to satisfy Neo4J's custom Lucene,
    
  •      not to be confused with the one used by Hibernate Search -->
    
  •    <!-- This is to satisfy Neo4J's custom Lucene: might not match the needs of Hibernate Search -->
    

Is this comment actually true any longer, now that it's only one version?


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-ogm/pull/744/files/71a373d2a2508724790c0ef12def67df85162a65#r74207596,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACmTRoBUR8r0RFfJCclziSpAbJzANDpks5qeZDlgaJpZM4JgHE1
.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, got it. I think the "satisfy" is what confused me. You actually override Neo4j's own version.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not really. In this section we don't pick the version, we're just adding the Lucene dependencies so that they get copied into the Neo4J modules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants