Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support the DNSCrypt protocol #4

Open
tarcieri opened this issue Sep 15, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Support the DNSCrypt protocol #4

tarcieri opened this issue Sep 15, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@tarcieri
Copy link

It would be nice if this server supported the DNSCrypt protocol:

https://dnscrypt.org/

cc @jedisct1

@tarcieri tarcieri changed the title Support the DNScrypt protocol Support the DNSCrypt protocol Sep 15, 2015
@bluejekyll
Copy link
Member

I'm definitely planning on supporting DNSSEC, I can probably do this too.

@tarcieri
Copy link
Author

Awesome. The use case is a bit orthogonal to DNSSEC (confidentiality and integrity within an "intranet"-style deployment between clients and a DNS server), but I would certainly consider it a welcome addition given your present roadmap.

@bluejekyll
Copy link
Member

Yeah, sorry, I get that it serves a different purpose, but it lines up with the set of features I want in the platform. I only get to work on this in my spare time at the moment, so it might be a while before I get all that in here.

@bluejekyll
Copy link
Member

FYI, in issue #38 there is a suggesting of first supporting https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7858.

Would people want to weigh in on that? I'll probably only end up really supporting one for a while (as either will fit my needs).

@bluejekyll
Copy link
Member

btw, the dnscrypt branch has some initial certificate code. so this is maybe 25% done at this point.

japaric added a commit to ferrous-systems/hickory-dns that referenced this issue May 29, 2024
minimal local network with working resolution
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants