Updated Discussion on Dynabook (markdown)

Discussion-on-Dynabook.md

@@ -193,9 +193,9 @@ Technically all these views are Morph instances representing the underneath mode
 
 but I would need more explanations to understand your point (you seem to defend that Smalltalk is a better technical solution, that provides direct access to the objects underneath, but I don't see how to present these points as convincing arguments to teachers in search of easily usable resources). 
 
-**---HF**: These are technical aspects on how those resources (script of dynamic knowledge model) will be produced. [[I explained earlier]](#one-laptop-er-child-olpc) that most teachers will rely on existing collections of scripts to insert dynamic contents in their documents. Nevertheless, the few willing to go further in designing dynamic content will be able to do directly from the Dynabook, with a dedicated editor whose a simplified view is shown below:
+**---HF**: These are technical aspects on how those resources (script of dynamic knowledge model) will be produced. [I explained earlier](#one-laptop-per-child-olpc) that most teachers will rely on existing collections of scripts to insert dynamic contents in their documents. Nevertheless, the few willing to go further in designing dynamic content will be able to do directly from the Dynabook, with a dedicated editor whose a simplified view is shown below:
 
-![Editor of script on geometric Dynamic Knowledge Model](resources/doc/DynabookApp/images/Script-DynamicKnowledge.png)
+![Editor of script on geometric Dynamic Knowledge Model](/resources/doc/DynabookApp/images/Script-DynamicKnowledge.png)
 
 **---JR**: Let me try to understand. Are [PhET simulations](https://phet.colorado.edu/) dynamic knowledge models?