Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CH Core Practitioner EPR: GLN identifier cardinality #221

Open
qligier opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

CH Core Practitioner EPR: GLN identifier cardinality #221

qligier opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@qligier
Copy link
Member

qligier commented May 26, 2023

CHCorePractitionerEPR.identifier:GLN is 1..1.

In the HPD, an individual provider can have multiple GLN identifiers: hcIdentifier is multivalued, and the description says:

Es wird geprüft, ob es mindestens einen Wert im Attribut hcIdentifier gibt, der mit "RefData:GLN:" beginnt.

To use CHCorePractitionerEPR in the mHealth integration of mCSD, the GLN identifier should be multivalued too.

@oliveregger
Copy link
Contributor

Telco 21.6:

Do we have a usecase that we more than one GLN for a Practitioner?
The specification change from single valued in 2017, to multivalued in 2020.
In current EPR implementation one GLN per HPD individual is assumed in implementations.

We will ask for background in AG TSI/eHealth Suisse for additional information.

@oliveregger oliveregger self-assigned this Jun 21, 2023
@oliveregger
Copy link
Contributor

The mulitivalued change came from an HPD CP proposal, not related to the Swiss EPR.

@oliveregger
Copy link
Contributor

@oliveregger
Copy link
Contributor

Oliver: Propose a change Proposal to limit the cardinality to one for GLN in above Annex

@jkiddo
Copy link

jkiddo commented Nov 28, 2023

@oliveregger shouldn't multiple GLN's be valid? Cant you have multiple - but only one active instead?

@ziegm
Copy link
Collaborator

ziegm commented Nov 28, 2023

#269

@jkiddo
Copy link

jkiddo commented Nov 28, 2023

@oliveregger shouldn't multiple GLN's be valid? Cant you have multiple - but only one active instead?

Nvm ... I'm drunk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants