New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adjustments due to the dropping of CDA #150
Comments
Section ids are not needed any more #155 |
@qligier |
I don't think so. |
@qligier |
In our use, it's kept as optional and fixed to 1; we're not making an important use of it, so it could be dropped. |
I will remove it from the differential table. It is still possible to use, because it's defined in the underlaying CH Core EPR profile. I will do the same for these elements:
|
@pjolo
|
Checked and good for me |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: