Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

objection to cardinality questionnaire and questionnaireresponse 0..1 #39

Closed
oliveregger opened this issue Apr 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@oliveregger
Copy link
Contributor

oliveregger commented Apr 11, 2022

Walter: The cardinality for Questionnaire and QR in Composition has been set to 0..1, without beeing this an issue in eToc balloting and in spite of in the intro in home allegedly mentioned this Implementation Guide relying heavily on the FHIR Resources Questionnaire and QuestionnaireResponse. The referenced issues and documentation in the change log point to RadOrderIssue #18 and ORF, not to eToc issues. Beeing this a very essential change against the balloted version which implies for the vendor community the need for implementing prorietary form integration for structured data as they cannot rely on forms as Questionnaire and QuestionnaireResponse, the balloting voting would not be valid under this circumstances, as it means different assumptions.

Objection. The cadinality has to been set to 1..1 again in CH eToc.

@oliveregger
Copy link
Contributor Author

Objection voted on HL7 TC meeting 7.4.2022 according to the ballot rules:
13 Yes 5 Abstain No 4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants