Prefer IPv4 locations over IPv6 locations for upnp devices/component

[StevenLooman]

Proposed change

Prefer IPv4 locations over IPv6 locations for upnp devices/component.

This requires a change to the ssdp component as well, as it has to store all known ssdp_locations in SsdpServiceInfo. I have tried to keep the changes in this component minimal, but one can argue that most passing of headers through the methods/functions should be changed by a SsdpDevice + st/dst pair.

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes UPnP/IGD unable to communicate with IGD at [IPv6 address] #102647
• This PR is related to issue:
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[bdraco]

Ran out of time to test today and need to sleep.

Will try to give it good test tomorrow (aka later today)

[bdraco]

Pushed to my production, testing now

[bdraco]

Everything seems ok on my production system.

I'm now trying it on systems with slower cpus

[bdraco]

functional testing looks good.

checking performance now

[bdraco]

Thanks @StevenLooman

testing looks good 👍
performance looks good 👍

[StevenLooman]

Thank you for testing and merging @bdraco!