Use device name stored in device_info for tag scan in ESPHome

[jesserockz]

Breaking change

@MartinHjelmare
Following on from #40128
This uses the device_info name instead of having the device_id sent through the api everytime. This way it cannot be spoofed too.

Proposed change

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Example entry for configuration.yaml:

# Example configuration.yaml

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
• This PR is related to issue:
• Link to documentation pull request:

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

The integration reached or maintains the following Integration Quality Scale:

• No score or internal
• 🥈 Silver
• 🥇 Gold
• 🏆 Platinum

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[jesserockz]

@MartinHjelmare I was ready to push this one extra commit when you merged the last PR with a comment from esphome/esphome#1281 (comment)

[probot-home-assistant]

Hey there @OttoWinter, mind taking a look at this pull request as its been labeled with an integration (esphome) you are listed as a codeowner for? Thanks!
_{^{(message by CodeOwnersMention)}}

[MartinHjelmare]

Let me know when we're ready to merge.

[jesserockz]

Sorry, yeah this is tested and working locally and ready to merge in =)
Thanks