Add Komfovent

[ProstoSanja]

Proposed change

Implement integration for "Komfovent" climate units, that are used primarily in North and East Europe.
They have a very simplistic authentication with user/password based on ip addresses, and support changing the operating modes, setting up some params, and looking up the current status.
Only part of those features is integrated:

• auth
• reading state of current mode and temperature
• setting a different operating state

Other parts may or may not be added by me in the future, depending on my availability and necessity coming from other people.
This integration is fully local. The actual integration part is available in my repo.
Integration was tested directly with the C6 controller unit, which to my knowledge is their most popular one in residential installs.

Type of change

• Dependency upgrade
• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New integration (thank you!)
• New feature (which adds functionality to an existing integration)
• Deprecation (breaking change to happen in the future)
• Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
• Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

• This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
• This PR is related to issue:
• Link to documentation pull request: add komfovent integration docs home-assistant.io#28041

Checklist

• The code change is tested and works locally.
• Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
• There is no commented out code in this PR.
• I have followed the development checklist
• I have followed the perfect PR recommendations
• The code has been formatted using Black (black --fast homeassistant tests)
• Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:

• Documentation added/updated for www.home-assistant.io

If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:

• The manifest file has all fields filled out correctly.
  Updated and included derived files by running: python3 -m script.hassfest.
• New or updated dependencies have been added to requirements_all.txt.
  Updated by running python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all.
• For the updated dependencies - a link to the changelog, or at minimum a diff between library versions is added to the PR description.
• Untested files have been added to .coveragerc.

To help with the load of incoming pull requests:

• I have reviewed two other open pull requests in this repository.

[home-assistant]

Hi @ProstoSanja

It seems you haven't yet signed a CLA. Please do so here.

Once you do that we will be able to review and accept this pull request.

Thanks!

[ProstoSanja]

Hello, just out of curiosity, is there anything missing in this PR, or is the backlog just this big? I am not really familiar with your process here. Thanks

[ProstoSanja]

resolved

[ProstoSanja]

Hello, @joostlek , any chance we can try and push this forward again? Everything seems to be resolved from my side.

Thanks and sorry for the ping, just trying to make sure it doesn’t get lost. If you have some process like running these things once a month or something, lmk so i don’t bother you without reason, thanks!

[joostlek]

I would prefer the device name over the hostname for the entry title. I think that's a more user friendly way, but it depends on the context

[ProstoSanja]

I would prefer the device name over the hostname for the entry title. I think that's a more user friendly way, but it depends on the context

Just a bit confused by what you mean by device name here, the information I am sending to hass is the following:

1. manufacturer: Komfovent
2. model: C60
3. friendly name: set by user in the native webUI
4. serial number

So which one of these should be entry name?
if we are talking about friendly name, which i just now set as device name, is it being duplicate okay? And what if it changes outside of hass, will it be picked up?

[joostlek]

Hmm, good question, I'll ask this tomorrow. From what I see this PR is near completion :)

[joostlek]

I just discussed this, we should use the name of the device for the initial config entry title. After that I think this should be about done

[ProstoSanja]

should be all resolved 👍🏻

[ProstoSanja]

Looks like some unrelated tests failed. Something I should be concerned about?

[ProstoSanja]

Looks like some unrelated tests failed. Something I should be concerned about?

@joostlek should I do something from my side?

[joostlek]

Reran them last time but forgot to leave a comment. When they pass I will merge it :P

Changes implemented