-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 497
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DE] add support for person_HassGetState #1657
[DE] add support for person_HassGetState #1657
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @steffenrapp
as always, thanks for contribution 👍
I think we should adopt the Dutch approach here
Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍 |
@mib1185 thanks for the review and the contributions. I'm working on fixing the errors. Have to rebuild some of the logic. |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
@mib1185 I adapted the logic and added more tests. Hope it's fine, maybe I can do a little bit more refinement in a separate PR afterwards. Also I want to use the new expansion rule |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @steffenrapp there are some comments from my side, thx 👍
Also I want to use the new expansion rule everywhere else where it fits.
great idea - let's keep this for a later PR 👍
Co-authored-by: Michael <35783820+mib1185@users.noreply.github.com>
Hi @steffenrapp |
Can get some more fine tuning but it's a start.