Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: debian package update #48

Merged
merged 16 commits into from Jan 16, 2017
Merged

WIP: debian package update #48

merged 16 commits into from Jan 16, 2017

Conversation

anarcat
Copy link
Contributor

@anarcat anarcat commented Jan 16, 2017

those are the changes I was thinking about in #47.

most of those are minor maintenance changes that you won't need to do in the future. only changes like 36e013d would be necessary on a regular basis.

as you can see, you will need to decide if you use debian/changelog or CHANGES as your main changelog. in my native packages, i just symlink the two together (example) and maintain everything in debian/changelog, but you may not like the format.

also note that the 1.2.1 release is marked as UNRELEASED. this means the release is not completed just yet, and tools (like gbp dch) will keep on adding new entries from your git history (automatically!) when you add stuff to the history.

another improvement that could be done would be to ship a systemd .service file, since it makes it easier to manage the service since Debian jessie. init.d files still work, of course, and we can keep on shipping it for those users who do not want or cannot run systemd... it would also be useful for other distros.

@anarcat anarcat mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2017
@anarcat
Copy link
Contributor Author

anarcat commented Jan 16, 2017

okay, i think i'm about done here - the only WIP left here is the question of the CHANGES vs debian/changelog files...

@SaveTheRbtz was the one that originally packaged this in hoytech#1, i thought it was upstream...
@hoytech
Copy link
Owner

hoytech commented Jan 16, 2017

Thank you! Let's not do a systemd unit file for now.

My only concern is, as you mentioned, the CHANGES/changelog split. I'd really prefer not maintaining 2 of them, and if possible not breaking the existing format. Is the format you've created required by debian?

@hoytech hoytech merged commit 8e65d7f into hoytech:master Jan 16, 2017
@hoytech
Copy link
Owner

hoytech commented Jan 16, 2017

I see you added instructions on how to maintain the changelog file in the PR. I'm merging your branch now, thanks again!

@anarcat anarcat deleted the debian branch January 16, 2017 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants