Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix B/W reporting for raw vs weighted I/O rates. #24

Closed
maherou opened this issue Nov 9, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Fix B/W reporting for raw vs weighted I/O rates. #24

maherou opened this issue Nov 9, 2015 · 1 comment
Projects

Comments

@maherou
Copy link
Collaborator

maherou commented Nov 9, 2015

Current B/W report does not correctly the raw B/W values. Here is the correct code:

doc.add("GB/s Summary","");
doc.get("GB/s Summary")->add("Raw Read B/W",fnreads/times[0]/1.0E9);
doc.get("GB/s Summary")->add("Raw Write B/W",fnwrites/times[0]/1.0E9);
doc.get("GB/s Summary")->add("Raw Total B/W",(fnreads+fnwrites)/(times[0])/1.0E9);
doc.get("GB/s Summary")->add("Total with convergence and optimization phase overhead",(frefnreads+frefnwrites)/(times[0]+fNumberOfCgSets*(times[7]/10.0+times[9]/10.0))/1.0E9);

maherou added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 9, 2015
Previously we were using the reference read/write operation counts.
Fixes issue #24.
@maherou
Copy link
Collaborator Author

maherou commented Nov 9, 2015

Completed.

@maherou maherou closed this as completed Nov 9, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant