You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Where I'm expecting an instance of SmalltalkCI to be returned (the current behavior on the master branch), however with the code on the non-closing-test branch, I get back a Boolean and I am curious if that is intentional or not.
I've tracked the change in behavior of the 'master' branch versus the non-closing-test branch to a change to the SmalltalkCI>>load method. Here's the master branch implementation:
If the change is intentional, then I will have to find another way to get the SmalltalkCI instance ... In this particular instance I am sending the message #compatibleConfigurationsFor: to the returned object (formerly a SmalltalkCI instance):
Hi Dale,
I changed the return value on purpose and was hoping nobody replies on it, but I do understand why you need. Let's put this on hold until the beginning of next month, hope you don't mind.
Currently in GsDevKit_home, I have written code that looks like the following:
Where I'm expecting an instance of SmalltalkCI to be returned (the current behavior on the
master
branch), however with the code on thenon-closing-test
branch, I get back a Boolean and I am curious if that is intentional or not.I've tracked the change in behavior of the 'master' branch versus the
non-closing-test
branch to a change to the SmalltalkCI>>load method. Here's themaster
branch implementation:and here's the
non-closing-test
branch implementation:If the change is intentional, then I will have to find another way to get the SmalltalkCI instance ... In this particular instance I am sending the message #compatibleConfigurationsFor: to the returned object (formerly a SmalltalkCI instance):
to pull the defaulSesionName from the configuration spec...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: