New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gen 8 support #26
Gen 8 support #26
Conversation
- should be stored now takes into account z moves correctly - is_z detect z versions of status moves
Fix move storing bug
Fix create battle and get battle methods in player
Add warning for username and login issues
Bumps [pyre-check](https://github.com/facebook/pyre-check) from 0.0.41 to 0.0.43. - [Release notes](https://github.com/facebook/pyre-check/releases) - [Commits](facebook/pyre-check@v0.0.41...v0.0.43) Signed-off-by: dependabot-preview[bot] <support@dependabot.com>
- Ignore error [45] in Enumeration classes as it arises from the behavior of the standard library's Enum objects - Add default values for numerous attributes
Bump pyre-check from 0.0.41 to 0.0.43
This allows more flexibility in defining species on pokemon creation, which solves problems related to alternate forms
Fix pokemon data bugs
0.0.43 is not available with python 3.7.
Alright, now that I think about it, this information ( |
I just managed to rerun tests locally, adjusted a few methods, nothing too big, just pushed out the changes. A couple of issues:
|
@szymonWojdat thanks for bringing that up, I'll look into it :) |
Just added:
I have tested both locally manually. Aside from writing tests for the new functionalities and fixing the failing ones, I believe we're done? |
We'll have to update docs too and be sure that z-moves still work as expected. Other than that, yes :) |
Just added a simple test for dynamax. Do you mind explaining what do you mean by "be sure that z-moves work as expected"? Were you refering to the fact that those were gone for a while and then moved back in? If so, then those commits aren't even in the tree anymore, so I'd expect them to work normally. I can also test those manually against my local PS instance or write a simple unit test if necessary. |
I was referring to this:
|
Thanks! I fixed both of those. Also added two Now integration tests are failing. |
@szymonWojdat Yes, sure! I just need to finish a couple of uni-related things; I'll get back into |
As discussed in #20
Copying over a checklist by @hsahovic that he mentioned here in order to keep track of what's left
Things to update:
Things to add:
Things to add if necessary: