Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 18, 2022. It is now read-only.

backport for OSGi R4 #49

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

greencable
Copy link

Hi Holger,

Here is the pull request for the R4 compatibility.

Thanks,
Guillaume

@hstaudacher
Copy link
Owner

Hi Guillaume,
sorry for the delay. Today I found time to review the change. I have some good and bad news ;)

First the tests were red. I had to fix them but now it works. The other thing is that I believe the backport was not complete. E.g. the configuration admin was imported with version 1.3.0 but r4 exports 1.2.0.

I also change the implementation because the backport had a lot of compiler warnings.

I pushed the update to the branch https://github.com/hstaudacher/osgi-jax-rs-connector/tree/osgi-r4-compatibility

Can you check it out and verify that everything is still working for you?

@greencable
Copy link
Author

Hi Holger,

Thanks for your answer and your work.

I’ll take one month off and after I’ll try to integrate in our software to tell you if it’s ok.

Best regards,

Guillaume

From: Holger Staudacher [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: dimanche 18 mai 2014 23:01
To: hstaudacher/osgi-jax-rs-connector
Cc: greencable
Subject: Re: [osgi-jax-rs-connector] backport for OSGi R4 (#49)

Hi Guillaume,
sorry for the delay. Today I found time to review the change. I have some good and bad news ;)

First the tests were red. I had to fix them but now it works. The other thing is that I believe the backport was not complete. E.g. the configuration admin was imported with version 1.3.0 but r4 exports 1.2.0.

I also change the implementation because the backport had a lot of compiler warnings.

I pushed the update to the branch https://github.com/hstaudacher/osgi-jax-rs-connector/tree/osgi-r4-compatibility

Can you check it out and verify that everything is still working for you?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #49 (comment) . https://github.com/notifications/beacon/7314645__eyJzY29wZSI6Ik5ld3NpZXM6QmVhY29uIiwiZXhwaXJlcyI6MTcxNjA2NjA1MSwiZGF0YSI6eyJpZCI6MzAyNDkzNDN9fQ==--18f2d3b2c1cde4e6f8beda952fd0abcca67e3577.gif

@hstaudacher
Copy link
Owner

Alright. Will merge it into master because I have tested it a lot with Equinox 3.6 the last days

@hstaudacher
Copy link
Owner

Applied with version 4.0

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants