Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistent language about list-based headers #298

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 4, 2020
Merged

Consistent language about list-based headers #298

merged 4 commits into from Feb 4, 2020

Conversation

mnot
Copy link
Member

@mnot mnot commented Feb 3, 2020

Does not address Vary (see #286), and some more discussion of some of the conditional request headers might be warranted.

Fixes #289.

software of each recipient, analogous to the <x:ref>User-Agent</x:ref> and
<x:ref>Server</x:ref> header fields. However, all comments in the Via field
<x:ref>Server</x:ref> header fields. However, comments in Via
are optional, and a recipient &MAY; remove them prior to forwarding the
message.
</t>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

appears not really related...

@mnot mnot merged commit e91bf72 into master Feb 4, 2020
@mnot mnot deleted the mnot-289 branch February 4, 2020 10:23
@mnot mnot restored the mnot-289 branch February 4, 2020 10:23
@mnot mnot deleted the mnot-289 branch February 4, 2020 10:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Audit: how we talk about list field values
3 participants