New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reject CONNECT requests without a port #772
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this something that needs to be listed as normatice change?
It isn't a normative change because the ABNF already requires port to be present in this form of request. The description is just inconsistent. I also intend to change the reference to 3986 to the right section of this document. |
…editorial, related to #736)
A CONNECT tunnel starts after the response header section editorial semantics httpwg/http-core#775 An upgraded protocol starts after the 101 response httpwg/http-core#777 Origin servers might support CONNECT httpwg/http-core#707 Reject CONNECT requests without a port httpwg/http-core#772 Clarify what cache proxy considerations apply to httpwg/http-core#770 Clarify large chunk handling issues httpwg/http-core#768 Discuss forwarding and extensibility httpwg/http-core#773 Explain implications of statelessness httpwg/http-core#764
Fixes #736