We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As @recvfrom noted in #1758 there were multiple places that talked about trailing dots. #2087 addressed one of them. The other is in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis#section-4.1.2.3 and is even present in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6265#section-4.1.2.3. I think that is all of them having looked at all mentions of "trailing".
I think it's been a misunderstanding that trailing dot domains are somehow invalid, despite mainly being uncommon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the catch, I even tried searching for other instances and still somehow missed this.
Sorry, something went wrong.
.
sbingler
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
As @recvfrom noted in #1758 there were multiple places that talked about trailing dots. #2087 addressed one of them. The other is in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis#section-4.1.2.3 and is even present in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6265#section-4.1.2.3. I think that is all of them having looked at all mentions of "trailing".
I think it's been a misunderstanding that trailing dot domains are somehow invalid, despite mainly being uncommon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: